Florida Supreme Court Stands Up For Privacy
If you agree with the idea that medical information should be private, how would you feel if you had to give up your right of privacy, just
because you or a loved one was hurt by medical negligence.
Obviously, nobody believes that relevant information pertaining to an
injury claim against a medical provider should be cloaked with the same privacy
rights as other medical information. But why would anyone have to give up their
right to privacy regarding unrelated records or medical information?
That’s what the Florida legislature tried to do, until the
Florida Supreme Court said “nope.”
In 2013, a law went on the books that required any person
who wanted to bring a claim for injury or death because of medical negligence
to make his or her treating physicians available for interviews. These
interviews would be conducted secretly and the claimant or his representative
was not allowed to be present or know what information was shared.
The interviews of a claimant’s treating physicians could be done by lawyers, expert consultants or insurance adjusters, and just about anyone else. The law has no restriction on the number of interviews that could take place. And it was not just limited to treating physicians relevant to the claimed injury, it was any treating physician.
The interviews of a claimant’s treating physicians could be done by lawyers, expert consultants or insurance adjusters, and just about anyone else. The law has no restriction on the number of interviews that could take place. And it was not just limited to treating physicians relevant to the claimed injury, it was any treating physician.
What was the idea behind this law? There are 2 points of
view. The stated reason is that doctors and hospitals need to be able to
properly defend these claims and weed out the frivolous ones. To do that
lawyers and their experts should be able sit down with somebody’s doctor and
ask any question they wanted without the difficulty of the claimant or her
lawyer interrupting or asserting objections to certain discussions.
The other perspective is that this would create one more
hurdle to impede people from bringing claims in the first place. Since we all
agree that the right to privacy is important and held dear by everybody, what
better way to deter people from bringing claims than to require them to share their
entire medical history with complete strangers and then make their doctors answer
unlimited questions about that person’s medical history.
Florida Supreme Court
Draws The Line On Privacy
In Weaver v. Myers,
(Fla. 2017), the Florida Supreme Court struck down this law in recognition of the
importance of the right to privacy. Giving up that right to help resolve claims
or weed out frivolous lawsuits didn’t make sense. But even more noteworthy, the
Florida Supreme Court recognized that this scheme would deter legitimate claims
resulting in restriction of access to the court system.
This decision condemns a law that restricts access to the
courts. That’s big!
Our State and Federal constitutions enshrine the right of
access to the courts. Laws that attempt to close the courthouse doors don’t square
with these rights. Keeping the courthouse doors open to all is a
central principle upon which Perenich The Law Firm was founded. Every day we
work to make this ideal a reality: Justice for all! We applaud our state
Supreme Court for stating the value of that principle in this decision.
Comments
Post a Comment